Sunday, February 9, 2014

Jews and Gentiles

   If I asked you to define God, what would you say? How would you define God? And so I ask you: Define God.
   Now that  you have done so, I must ask you. Is this definition your own, or is it the definition that someone has given you?
   There is a clearer way to ask this, and that is, before you started immersing yourself into the doctrine of your religion of choice... before you heard from anyone else who God was, what God was, where God was; who was God to you?
   Chances are that you do not recall a time where you encountered the idea of God independent of the definitions or influence of others. This is not your fault of course or mine. We are creatures of our environment.
   But how do you define something that has no history?
   How do you accept the stories of authors that have no identity and therefore no confirmation, as truth written by God and for God, inspired by him. How do you know that God is a male. How do you know that God is not a woman? What makes you think that God could be either?
   What I've come to understand is that we all define God in our own way. The concept of religion is not superior. It is simply more widely accepted and therefore practiced than a humble individual notion. And yet, it does not make it true.  
   I want to be clear that I believe in God. I believe in Jesus. But I do not believe that Jesus actually existed. Therefore, I do not believe that Jesus was God's son. I believe in Jesus the ideal; the concept; the moral fabric that would weave such a creation. I believe in that Jesus. But Jesus never existed. Sin is a fabrication of something more grave and practical: disloyalty and disharmony.
  The idea that it is a sin to love whomever you choose, or to commit adultery is laughable. Name one old testament wedding. Who married Adam and Eve? Name one old testament patriarch that did not have more than one wife. Marriage is an institution created by people. Established by people who defined their lives by methods of oppression.
   These views of mine place me in an incredible juxtaposition amongst my peers for they are the majority, Christians, who live and die by every word in that leather bound text and are devoted to the accepted lineage of its creed. I do not seek to unravel this devotion because this devotion was brought about by elements more powerful and conclusive than mere words. This devotion was brought about by the systematic engineering of culture. And this is something that words, no matter how concise, supported and evidenced cannot compete against.
   The American way of life demands a Savior. It demands a savior because America is a carbon copy of the Greco- Roman empire. Nothing could be more vile, obscene or amoral than that heathen state of greed, murder, lust and destruction. Yet America was a necessary evolution of the change brought about by the maturation of science. The Greco- Roman empire demanded a moral savior because of its immoral seed, its only begotten son, Capitalism, doomed the world it knew and continues to whore, to slavery and infested brothels. The treasure which funded its expansion was brutally taken from Africa.
   Jesus is as Capitol as the Federal Reserve. Just as empirical as the rulers his image represents. The cross is as sacred as the constitution and that is because they both arose from the same construct.
   Imagine, for a moment, pledging your loyalty to someone you've never met, and will never actually know. And yet you are told that this person has done everything for you and therefore you owe this man your allegiance. The conscious mind would then ask the following:
   "What is it that this Savior, this man, has done for me?" We then find that the entirety of our salvation is based on a construct called sin. This debilitating entity that has no premise was seemingly created out of thin air. The problem, is that it was created from the same people who gave us Jesus in the first place.
   That is like saying that we have to pay taxes to avoid our nation's economy defaulting on its loans, only to find that we are paying taxes to the very same folks who are creating our debt in the first place. Which of course happens to be precisely what is going on in this very moment thanks to the creation of the Federal Reserve System. 
  
 
   I will anger a great many with this article. No doubt I have already angered a great many. The truth of the matter is, however, that none of my research is original. I research everything that I write and each of my articles are the investigation of claims made by true historians. Not evangelical apologists who simply learned a way of thinking from a school of thought created by the people who created the culture in the first place.
   I'm not a theologian who is a professional regurgitation of commentaries. I posses intellectual vigor.
   I do not write or make claims based on a point of view to steer an agenda. For the only agenda I have is the truth. And you will find that if you escape the learned traditions of your religious education and view things purely as an observer of historical facts, the truth illuminates the lies.
   I make no apologies for my views. I am an African. I am a liberationist. And I therefore am an African liberationist. My native land has been conquered by invaders and my people have been in exile ever since. We have adopted pagan culture. We have adopted pagan religion. And we have adopted pagan wives. We have been stripped of our ancestral rights and heritage, to the effect that we no longer know to what tribe we belong. We have been given the name of our conquerors and oppressors. Our spirituality was stolen, recreated in the image of Europeans and fed back to us in the form of a pagan religion called Christianity. I have no choice but to speak out against the lies that have befallen my people. I have no choice but to resurrect the voices of my murdered ancestors. I have no choice but to summon the royalty of the Pharaoh's of old so that anyone who will listen can know what has been done; what is being done, and what will be done.
   Do not mistake my words for hatred. Do not accept the infantile dissemination of logic that conveniences my scorn for bitterness. Bitterness means that you have no hope and no recourse. I assure you this could not be further from the truth.
   It is a fact; an irrefutable fact that the book called the bible is a forgery. Yes I have said it. And no matter how adamantly you may try and prove this assertion false, you will only succeed in turning over the rocks of ancient Egypt that endure. And they are these rocks which tell the truth. They are these rocks which have been there all along; shouted down by a religious ruling class who knew the truth but obscured it from the conscious of the public. But the evidence has been presented, the cases have been made and the verdict is in. It does not matter how many appeals the Christian church files, and how many motions they've tried to suppress, the verdict has been read and it is not in the favor of this religion which has been created in the name of a man they have called Jesus.
   Forgery is defined as the action of forging or producing a copy of a document, signature, banknote, or work of art which alters the integrity of the original. None of the books of the New Testament were written by any of the men they are claimed to have been written by. None of the gospels are. None of the epistles are. They have been tampered with and altered time and time again. Not only through the unfortunate method of language translation but by the simple fact that we do not know who the original authors were in the first place. *See my previous article: The Swastika of Martin Luther.
   None of the books of the Old Testament were the writings of any of the authors they are reported as have being written by and we know this because the first copies of the Torah only date back 800 years which is 800 years after the first New Testament bible was published. I repeat, the oldest known Torah scroll is only dated as far back as the thirteenth century A.D. do not take my word for it pilgrim. Look it up for yourself. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/05/130530-worlds-oldest-torah-scroll-bible-bologna-carbon-dating/
   And I quote: "This week, University of Bologna Professor Mauro Perani announced the results of carbon-14 tests authenticating the scroll's age as roughly 800 years old.
The scroll dates to between 1155 and 1225, making it the oldest complete Torah scroll on record." -Diane Cole
Published May 30, 2013
  
   What I am telling you pilgrim, is that writings which are suppose to be ancient law, existing during the time of David, the law that Jesus came to fulfill never existed until the Catholic church created it.
   We know we do not know who the original authors were because each of the afore mentioned books and scroll(s) were written; not published; written decades and in the case of the Torah- centuries after the persons the books are attributed to- died. The question then, is who wrote the bible?
   The Dead Sea Scrolls are a mockery of historicity. I understand the enthusiasm over the fact that upwards of 500 B.C. there were found fragments of texts which mimic almost identically the books of the Torah and Old Testament Bible. What is just as ludicrous is that these texts are found amongst a slew of other fragments that are texts belonging to Jewish stories which have uniformly been accepted as myth, legend and literary fiction.
  We are known by the company we keep. If I go to a library under the fiction section and I find a fictitious book that reads like an historical document, it is still fiction. And the author who put it there knows it.
   Furthermore, mere fragments of some of the Septuagint have been included in these legendary scrolls. Are we then to assume that the rest of the writings that were omitted are somehow proof that they were ever actually written? And how is this conclusion drawn? Because the texts, which no one knows their origin, say that it is the word of God.
   Foolish pilgrim, who wrote it? If you don't know who wrote something, you cannot verify its authenticity. If you cannot suggest who wrote it you cannot suggest it is reliable. These stories allege events that have never been seen in this world nor ever will be. And the more outlandish they are, the more religious they become. History does not know who the Jews are. And there certainly was no mass Exodus from Egypt. It is not recorded anywhere.
   Observe:
   "We Jews and Church Leaders have known since the beginning of Christianity that it was
synthesized by the Roman Piso family for the purpose of maintaining control over the masses and to
placate slaves. And, this is why we Jews are the "Chosen People" and why we have endured so
much for so many years; we are witnesses to the lie. Our ancestors wrote what they could about
this in our texts."

FROM CHAPTER I (The True Authorship of the New Testament)
  
   The authors of the bible are the Piso/Flavian dynasty. And that is why the only historian in the history of the world who can independently verify the accuracy of the bible is a man called Flavius Josephus.
   "Professor Bruno Bauer, in his work of 1877 "Christ and the Caesars" stated that he had concluded that the Romans had authored the New Testament and that Flavius Josephus was the inventor of Jesus."
   What is the Piso/Flavius dynasty? You may ask. The Piso family are royal relatives of the Roman  Herods who were given control of the Semitic provinces. The Herods of course were relatives to the Flavian Emperors. Flavius Josephus, in fact, was merely a pseudonym for the real face behind the bible and its "independent" history. Josephus' real name was Arrius Piso.
   Observe:
   The tie-in is that Arria the Elder was married to the emperor Vespasian’s
brother (before Vespasian became emperor). He was T. Flavius Sabinus.

From this relationship we find the connection to the alias names of the Pisos
as "Paetus". Quoting from "The True Authorship of the New Testament," by
Abelard Reuchlin; "Vespasian relied upon Piso because he was grandson of
his own brother - Vespasian’s brother, T. Flavius Sabinus, had married Arria
Sr. (i.e., Arria the Elder), who was Piso’s maternal grandmother. Piso’s
identity as thus also a Flavian is decipherable from the appearance in the
Flavian family line of L. Caesennius Paetus (Townend, Gavin, "Some Flavian
Connections," Journal of Roman Studies, LI. 54, 62, 1961). That was an alias
(like Thrasea Paetus) of Piso’s father, L. Calpurnius Piso [ Note: we now
know Arrius Piso’s father to have been Gaius Calpurnius Piso who was
executed by Nero]. See page 20 supra, wherein Piso himself also is mentioned
as a Caesennius Paetus. That is the true reason Piso used the literary
pseudonym of Flavius; it was not because of his alleged - but untrue and
hardly necessary - adoption by Emperor Flavius Vespasian. He was in fact
(already) a Flavian."

  
   The question then, is who was Arrius Piso? The answer is simple. He was Roman royalty. The governor of Syria and what is now also called Palestine. What you will find is that the so called Jews found their origins here not in the wilderness of a so called Canaan. Instead, there in the Semitic region of Syria, they are in fact European royalty. The Hebrews are not Jewish. The Jews are not Hebrews. The Hebrews are Africans. The Jews are European royalty.
   It is a fact that Mark was the first gospel to be written. It is believed; based on this fact, that the other the other three gospels of Matthew, Luke and John were written based on the claims of Mark. Of course this claim was made before the first recorded bible ever written Codex Sinaiticus revealed that there was no resurrection story in Mark. Which means that Mark 16:9-20 were the creation of someone. Who created it, why they created it, and when they created it is unknown. But the fact of the matter is that the resurrection of the man called Jesus was not contemporary to the life of the man. It was created over 400 years after Jesus died. And so to were the other three gospels.
  It doesn't mater if you don't believe me; you can research it for yourself.  Therefore do not take my word for it, the gospels are not contemporary to the events they claim to be witnessing and neither are the epistles. None of the authors were eyewitnesses to Jesus; of Jesus; to Jesus. In any court of law, this is what we would consider hearsay. They are anonymous sources- people we cannot know their identity. The only claims that these people ever existed are made by the oral traditions inscribed in the forged writings of the bible.
   The stories of Jesus reflected in the gospels and the epistles are stories that are modifications of the oral traditions of Jesus and adaptions of Egyptian mythology.
   I do not contend that Jesus existed. I do not contend that Jesus was God's son. We are all God's children. What I do contend however, is that the biblical accounts of the man called Jesus; which by the way wasn't even his real name, neither was it Ye'shua or Ye'hoshua because that means Joshua. In fact the name Jesus never existed until the fourth century A.D.
   Constantine was the ruling spirit at Nicaea and he ultimately decided upon a new god for them. To involve British factions, he ruled that the name of the great Druid god, Hesus, be joined with the Eastern Savior-god, Krishna (Krishna is Sanskrit for Christ), and thus Hesus Krishna would be the official name of the new Roman god. -The Swastika of Martin Luther.
   Again you can look this up.
   What I do not believe is that the Jews ever existed. I believe an Afro- Semitic people called Hebrews existed. But the Hebrews and the Jews are not the same thing. I do not believe that there was ever an Exodus from Egypt and therefore I do no believe any of the stories attributed to these people. I do not believe there was a king David. I do not believe in a so called royal bloodline. And even if I did, you would still have to explain to me why there are two different lineages that the book of Matthews gives Jesus' royal origin. Furthermore, if he was born of a virgin; which I do not believe either, the lineages listed are not of Mary's, they are both Joseph's.
   Call me stupid but if I cannot produce the bloodline of my mother, only that of my father- from whom I was never actually conceived because I claim my conception was of immaculate divine origin- there is reason to believe that I never existed either.
   There is no historical evidence that there was ever any exodus from Egypt. (See Unearthing the Bible).
   There is no evidence of Solomon, David, Joshua, or Moses, or any other of these so called Jewish Patriarchs. What you have instead are an Afro- Semitic people who spoke Aramaic, which is not to be confused with Arabic, a nomadic people with no home and no ancestral heritage who were given a history by the most powerful institution ever created: the Roman Catholic church.
   Supposedly these people called the Jews established a kingdom which dwarfed the concepts of the greatest empirical nations of their time; Babylonians, the Persians, and the Egyptians. And yet not one iota of concrete evidence of the existence of these people can be found. Not one burial ground, monument, artifact, or token can be found to attribute the existence of a people called the Jews. Again, not to be confused with Hebrews, which are Aramaic nomads; history cannot figure out where the Jews belong in the chronological summary of events. The people who call themselves Jews today are not Hebrews, they are European Semites.
   The only place that the Jews existed is the bible. History cannot find them.
   I am going to make a claim that may sound absurd to you. But it only sounds absurd because you've never heard it before. Yet if you do your research you will discover that the absurdity is historical fact, verified, not only by a plagiarized book, but by separate cultures spawning vast oceanic waters and histories which have verifiable records. Before I present my thesis I want to first present some factual parallels which establish the premise for this thesis.
   Some parallels between Horus and Jesus Christ:

1. Horus born of a virgin. Jesus born of a virgin.

2. The foster father of Horus was Seb or Seph. Jesus was fostered by Joseph.

3. Horus was of royal descent. Jesus was of royal descent.

4. Horus birth accompanied by three solar deities [star gazers] who followed by the morning star of Sirius bearing gifts. Jesus birth accompanied by three wise men [Zoroastrian star gazers] who followed by a star “in the east” bearing gifts.

5. The birth of Horus announced by angels. The birth of Jesus announced by angels.

6. Herut tried to murder the infant Horus. Herod slaughtered every first born in an attempt to kill Jesus the forthcoming messiah.

7. Horus is baptized at age 30 by Anup the Baptiser at a river. Jesus is baptized at age 30 by John the Baptist at a river.

8. Horus resists temptation by the evil Sut [Sut was to be the precursor for the Hebrew Satan] on a high mountain. Jesus resists temptation by Satan on a high mountain.

9. Horus had 12 followers. Jesus had 12 disciples.

10. Horus performed miracles like healing the sick and walking on water. Jesus performed miracles like healing the sick and walking on water.

11. Horus raised someone from the grave [his father Osiris] Jesus raised Lazarus [notice the name similarity] from the grave. Lazarus is short for Elasarus - the “us” on the end is romanized. Elasarus was derived from “El-Asar” which was the name given to Osiris.

12. Horus was buried and resurrected in the city of Anu. The place Bethany mentioned in John was a derivative of the words “Bet” and “Anu” which translates “the house of Anu”. The ‘y’ on the end of bethany is interchangeable with the letter ‘u’.

13. Horus was killed by crucifixtion. Jesus was crucified.

14. Horus was accompanied by two thieves at the crucifixtion. Jesus was crucified with two thieves.

15. Horus was buried in a tomb at Anu. Jesus was buried in a tomb located in Bethany [Bet-Anu].

16. Horus was resurrected after 3 days. Jesus was “said” to resurrected after over a period of three days.

17. The resurrection of Horus was announced by three women. The resurrection of Jesus was announced by three women.

18. Horus was given the titel KRST which means “anointed one” Jesus was given the title Christ [Christos] meaning “anointed one”
  
   Understand that Egyptian mythology, or Maat, predates the legacy of the man called Jesus Christ by more than 3000 years. I will present compelling arguments that the entire bible is the plagiarized literature of Maat. But before we get there I want you to understand why the Jews were created by the Roman Catholics, why and how their legacy has been widely and successfully distributed as truth. To do this I will use the bible. The following is an excerpt taken from Genesis 10:2-20.
   2 The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras. 3 And the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz, and Riphath, and Togarmah. 4 And the sons of Javan; Elishah, and Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim. 5 By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations. 6 And the sons of Ham; Cush, and Mizraim, and Phut, and Canaan. 7 And the sons of Cush; Seba, and Havilah, and Sabtah, and Raamah, and Sabtecha: and the sons of Raamah; Sheba, and Dedan. 8 And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a mighty one in the earth. 9 He was a mighty hunter before the LORD: wherefore it is said , Even as Nimrod the mighty hunter before the LORD. 10 And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, and Erech, and Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar. 11 Out of that land went forth Asshur, and builded Nineveh, and the city Rehoboth, and Calah, 12 And Resen between Nineveh and Calah: the same is a great city. 13 And Mizraim begat Ludim, and Anamim, and Lehabim, and Naphtuhim, 14 And Pathrusim, and Casluhim, (out of whom came Philistim,) and Caphtorim. 15 And Canaan begat Sidon his firstborn, and Heth, 16 And the Jebusite, and the Amorite, and the Girgasite, 17 And the Hivite, and the Arkite, and the Sinite, 18 And the Arvadite, and the Zemarite, and the Hamathite: and afterward were the families of the Canaanites spread abroad . 19 And the border of the Canaanites was from Sidon, as thou comest to Gerar, unto Gaza; as thou goest , unto Sodom, and Gomorrah, and Admah, and Zeboim, even unto Lasha. 20 These are the sons of Ham, after their families, after their tongues, in their countries, and in their nations.   
   Now, you may ask, why is this important and what does this have to do with anything? It is important my friend because this is the only passage in the Torah that decisively tells you who the Hebrews are and who the Europeans are. You see, the word Gentile never meant anyone who is not a Jew. It meant anyone who is not a descendant of Ham. Verse 5 of the above texts is clearly informing you that the peoples mentioned are the Gentiles. It just so happens that they are all Europeans. 
   The legacy verses of Genesis Chapter 10 are verses 6-20. They are the descendants of Ham. The interesting fact is that they are all African or of African lineage. Cush is Ethiopia, Mizraim is Egypt, Phut is Libya, Canaan is Palestine. I could go on. The point, however, is that according to their own plagiarized source, the Hebrews, who were God's chosen people, were actually Africans. And they are only every European who are the Gentiles. It says so plainly in the text.
   And yet, if you fast forward a few hundred years to the so called new testament gospels and epistles you will find the polar opposite. A redefinition of Gentiles around the construct of Jews which first entered the scene in the new testament. Previously, the Jews did not exist.
   The question then, is who are the Jews? I think the answer is plain. The Jews are Europeans of Semitic lineage who have laid claim to the historical background of the Hebrews. The Hebrews of course, are of African origin. It is this subversion of the true nature of things that have led to the creation of European empires, which did not previously exist, leading to the destruction and ruin of a people, a continent and cultures that begat life in the first place. In order to elevate a culture that you fashioned in your own image, you must first destroy the culture you stole it from. Mark Zuckerburg stole Facebook from the Winklevoss twins and subsequently trampled them into obscurity. PlayStation was created from Nintendo which has been flushed into oblivion. I won't even mention what happened to Sega.
   The UFC has destroyed or consumed every major fight promotion that has gotten in its way. If you look at the UFC today it is not actually the UFC. The UFC is PRIDE, WFA, WEC, Strikeforce. And yet it is the UFC. In the same way, anti- African transatlantic slavery was the result of years of empirical destruction of the peoples whose culture the Greco Roman empire was founded upon. The only way to elevate Rome was to destroy the Africa which spawned it into existence.
   Religion is the deification of a culture. Nothing more. And the agenda of spreading a religion is a method of spreading that culture for culture and racial superiority. The creators of the religion become the God(s) of the people they've conquered; and if implemented properly, it is for this reason that a "liberated" people can be a colony of the conquering force. India is still a colony of great Britain which was preluded by the British Empire which was funded by the Roman Catholic church. India may have won it's independence but it's culture is fashioned after the Empire which fell but exists in the embodiment of the United States.
   Africans live in America. We are not African Americans, we are Africans who have been stripped of our lineage. Our native land was conquered and we were sold into slavery. Unlike the Exodus of the Jews, this is not a fabricated story. We will go home, our monuments will endure, our coins will be remembered and our kings will be celebrated because African liberation will not adopt the ways of our conquerors. We will not accept the culture of our oppressors. Many have. We- I- will not. For when you have knowledge, you don't need faith. Therefore you don't need credit, which means the manufactured creation of debt and sin and grace do not exist. Which is why the search for such a thing and it's discovery is discouraged by the church.
   Anyone who does their research and arrives at any conclusion such as mine is ridiculed as having the spirit of the anti Christ, false prophets, lost, on my way to hell...so on and so forth. Question: if eternity is not a physical place, how can I be punished by the material lakes of fire or be rewarded with the earthly corruptions of streets of gold.
   The Roman Empire never fell. Roman Catholicism insured its survival and the United States of America is its modern Avatar. Yet I want to assert to you that the Jews do not exist. They never existed. The sons of Japheth, called the Gentiles in Genesis 10:2-5 are the only so called Jews who ever existed. You call them Jews; but the bible calls them Gentiles. You decide, faithful Christian, which discernment is correct. The Jews are not a nation.
   Israel was created out of thin air just like sin, just like currency, just like debt. These are the arbitrary orchestrations of powerful people with the agenda of world domination. They've created a masterful story of Armageddon and centered it around the assault against Israel, a nation that, in truth, has no right to exist. But if you put an Islamic republic right in the middle of America's Heartland how would you respond oh Christian? Would you not resort to any means necessary to rid your homeland of the foreign invaders? Then why do you support the state of Israel? God choose the Jews, only if you understand that the Jews created the God that chose them. And the that the Greco- Roman empire created the Jews.
   Have the integrity then to see through the manipulation of the State and the powers of capital control. We will find that the Jews are nothing more than Europeans with Semitic roots. The only chosen people of God, if you believe such a thing, were Africans. Our conquerors knew this and so they created a people called the Jews. They could not allow us to wrestle our heritage back from them. Therefore they organized a religion to go along with the slave ships. They gave us a bible along with our chains. They called themselves Jews to us and we gave up our God given heritage to them so that now our African men are emaciated and our African women are prostitutes, loving, needing and defending the very nation which raped us in the first place. And the tool which begets this depravity is Christianity.
   I will utter this quote: "The central figure of the ancient Egyptian Religion was Osiris, and the chief fundamentals of his cult were the belief in his divinity, death, resurrection, and absolute control of the destinies of the bodies and souls of men. The central point of each Osirian's Religion was his hope of resurrection in a transformed body and of immortality, which could only be realized by him through the death and resurrection of Osiris" (Osiris and the Egyptian Resurrection Volume 1)
   This sounds like a vaguely familiar doctrine to me. And let me ask you, which story came first. I think we know the answer to this. It wasn't the Christian doctrine. Horus, the son of Osiris had a divine nature and a human nature. Horus was believed to be both fully divine and fully human. It is believed that Horus was the twin brother of Sat, otherwise known as Seth. Who was the Egyptian precursor to the European Satan.
    Horus was the son of Osiris and Isis, the product of a virgin birth who rose from the dead through the conquering of his archenemy Set, an original acronym for Satan. At the hand of his only begotten son Horus.
   It is important to understand that this Egyptian story predates the virgin birth of the man called Jesus by centuries. It is also important to understand that the very same people who invaded Egypt are responsible for creating the bible, forging it's literature and establishing the religion of what is today called Christianity. It is just as important to understand that this religion only took shape after the hieroglyphs, which are the ancient Egyptian religious mythology, were translated.
   There is no such thing or person as a man who lived in the ancient Roman Empire named Jesus. I am not trying to be controversial but it is a fact. Jesus is not a Hebrew, Jewish or Semitic name. Jesus, translated into Aramaic, which was the Semitic language of that time, is translated as Ye'hoshua or adapted as Yeshua. But even Yeshua does not mean Jesus. Yeshua means Joshua. There was no Aramaic, Semitic, Jewish, or Hebrew name that one can attribute to Jesus. Jesus Christ didn't exist until the first Council of Nicea. *See The Swastika of Martin Luther
   I am going to get straight to the point and inform you once again, that this is because the savior of the world known as Jesus was a creation of an elite European culture (root word cult) who labeled themselves as Jews. These people created the bible as a plagiarized version of Egyptian Maat.
   What is Maat? Maat or ma'at, also spelled māt or mayet, was the ancient Egyptian concept of truth, balance, order, law, morality, and justice.
   After the European invasion of Egypt by Alexander, Egypt has lost its sovereignty. Egypt lost its sovereignty by the deception of the European alleging that they had come in peace. Egypt has lost its sovereignty and has never regained it. Alexander tried to become recognized as Pharaoh and failed. His successor, Ptolemy I also known as Soter or Savior tried as well but failed. The problem was that they could not decipher the Mecunenta which are called by archeologists as Hieroglyphics.
   Thousands of African men and women died because they refused to decipher their ancient spiritual texts which dated back over two thousand years B.C. The European invaders understood that the key to the might of these savages came as a direct result from the beliefs and the knowledge of the Mecunenta. Religion organizes culture. An organized people are a powerful people, a wealthy people.
   Ptolomy the I was the beginning of the Roman Ptolomy era in Egypt. With the help of Egyptian coptics, the original traitors to the empire, they translated much of our Mecunenta to the invaders. The problem for the invaders is that they did not translate everything properly. Some of this was done on purpose and much of it was a simple matter of the pitfalls of language barriers. Yet what was produced was the plagiarizing of Egyptian spirituality. It was rewritten, Europeanized and fed to the world as their own so that the creators of the religion would be worshipped as God.
   Though a people may overthrow an invader, they not so easily are able to unbelieve  that which you have been taught to believe. That is because religion is psychological warfare. It is nothing more than this.
   Alexander knew that in order to effectively rule Egypt he had to also be accepted into their religious order, in keeping with the tradition of the Pharaohs. Alexander died in 323 B.C. without being granted this enviable right.
   Yet Soter, his Egyptian successor, or Ptolomy I murdered as many Egyptian priests as it took until the Melkite Coptic priests relinquished, sold out, and translated the Mecunenta. They granted him his wish and so changed Soter's, name to Serapis. And yet the only place in Egypt that Serapis' authority was accepted was in Memphis, the region of the Melkite Coptics. In his anger, Serapis shut down all the temples in Egypt.
   In return for their betrayal, the leader of the Melkite Coptic priests, Sylvester, was elected the first pope of the Roman Catholic church. This is why, to this day, Coptic Christians, elect their own Pope and have their own Papal order.
   It is the figure head of Serapis that was adopted as the face of Jesus and is still today the European figure head of the man called Jesus. Christians worship the European conqueror of Egypt. He was a liar, a thief and a murderer.
   I'm not sure where this information was omitted from history. I suppose it was suppressed by the same folks who created this diabolical construct. Currency is nothing more than the physical analogy of salvation. Sin is the spawn of the physical reality of debt. Faith and credit are as closely related. Catholicism needed the Jews in order to expand its influence. For there can be no unification toward empirical expansion without the fear of an opposition.
   In this way Christianity today needs Islam. For without Islam the spread of capitalism and the ever growing net of wealth disparity and global servitude cannot be realized.
   The key is this: If you can convince the people you've stripped of wealth that their salvation depends on surrendering their earthly riches in return for eternal wealth that can only come from serving the one who stripped you in the first place, then you will inherit eternal salvation and riches that will never die.
   Insanity does not begin to describe this motive or belief. It is lunacy. And yet this lunacy has been encouraged and demanded by our culture. If you live in a capitalist culture you need a Savior. If you live in a dictatorship you do not need a moral Savior, you need a physical conqueror.
   We find that each monotheistic religion is not original. It is not original because they each borrowed from each other. The question then, is where did they borrow from?
   The answer of course is Africa. The story of Africa is greater than the continent itself. The story of Africa is the story of creation. God is not up in heaven. God is within you. God is of you. God is you. God is us. All of us together, all of our spirits united is God. And yet with the confusion of religion, currency and monies that do not exist, this unity can never be found. And God will forever be a euphemism, not a reality.
   I want every woman and man to know and understand that he is here because he created himself. She is here because she created herself. Life is the paintings we have imagined as ever present realities coming to completion. The purpose of life is to experience what we have created, individually and collectively in order to establish harmony for the next painting. And the next, and the next. No artist ever depletes himself of creations.  Artists fail to create when they lose inspiration. Therefore your spirit only dies when you cease to encourage its production. Religions teach you to stop searching. To believe that you have found it.
   But truth is ever evolving, and so is God because we are the architects by the lives we live and the patterns we weave.
   Aligning yourself with religious regimes may give you purpose in this life, but it will rob you of your place in the next.
   Spirits do not die. They are eternal because spirits are possibilities. Canvasses that are waiting for inspiration.
   Spirits have no memories only consciousness. Here on this earth we have been compounded with a soul. This soul is our memory, our primary weapon against insignificance. It is why life is so sacred. For whatever period of time harmony suggests, we have the ability to remember everything, both past and future, in order to become the gods we created ourselves to be. Therefore, never stop searching. Jesus is not the answer. Jesus is a proposition. Muhammad is not the solution. Merely an antithesis against selected influence.
   We were given our souls to recall why we are here. We created ourselves and therefore we must give ourselves life. We must give each other life. And life will give us a future. You owe your existence to harmony; the balance of spirits and souls.
   I do not worship God because God is not meant to be worshipped. God is meant to be created with every breath, every stroke, every idea, every relation. God is evolving whether you know it or not, whether you believe it or not. If you think that God is some deified moral authority arbitrating his rules and laws down to a wayward woeful man, you belong on the slave ship your ancestors died on or the chains your forefathers created.
   Our morals are each different yet they are measured on the same scale, called to the same standard. Our life spans are not the same and yet we determine this with the life we lived before, with the patterns we use to paint the creation.
   Do not blame God for the evils of the world, do not blame Satan. Satan and God are one and the same. It is you and I; I and I who are responsible for the now, the past and the future.
   "I know... the blasphemy by those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan."-Revelation 2:9

No comments:

Post a Comment