Saturday, February 22, 2014

The Bible As An Allegory

  
 
   The Dead Sea Scrolls...what are they, and why are they so important?
   To understand this, you must first understand the irony of Judaism. Judaism has always placated Christianity, from the origin of the religion of the Roman cross, even until now as the Jews do not believe in a Jesus Christ. And yet, half of the Christian bible is the Hebrew bible; so that no matter how far Christians may try to distance themselves from the unbelieving Jews, they will never succeed in doing so. Christians need the Jews for theological relevance. The Jews need the Christians to avoid extermination at the hand of their Muslim neighbors. And yet the whole thing is one dramatic nod to the origin of all of this divine worship.
   Kemet. Or Egypt.
   What is strange about the Torah is the assertion that these books are the works of a god. The God by all accounts. But according to whom? Let us assume for a moment, that each of the books of the old testament bible are the identical translations of the Torah texts, found in the dead sea scrolls. I want us then to understand the litany of texts, or books, that were also found among these scrolls. Observe just to name a few:


- The Book of Tobit
- The Letter of Jeremiah (normally included with The Book of Baruch)
- The Book of Ecclesiasticus


Just a sample of books found among the DSS but not found in the KJV:
- The Book of Jubilees
- The Book of 1 Enoch
- from The Testament of the Twelve Patriarchs
- - The Testament of Levi
- - The Testament of Naphtali
- - The Testament of Joseph
- The Book of Noah
- The Genesis Apocryphon


   Note that for most of these, only very small fragments of each book were found. What should also be noted is that the book of Esther was not found among the DSS. This means that someone created the story. By whom and for what, we do not know. And yet, we are to know that divine God inspired it. I think not.
   Oh my friend, I have many questions for you and I greatly anticipate your response. What is the book of Tobit? What is the book of Baruch? Jubilees? Enoch? The Testament of the Twelve Patriarchs, Levi, Naphtali, Joseph, Noah, The Genesis Apocryphon... all these texts found amongst the Dead Sea Scrolls, and yet, they were all dismissed from the canonized bible for insufficient merit.
   How is it that all of these texts would have been written together, intended by their preservers to belong together and yet modern religions have decided to separate them and label some the inerrant word of God, and others unreliable fictitious tales? Is it possible that they are all, in fact, the work of fiction and that a few celebrated men chose to elevate them to the status of divine origin?
   Here is what we know. Every original civilization wrote their history in stone. The Sumerians, the Egyptians, the Mayans. Of these original civilizations, animal skin writings, parchments, have always been the work of foreign influences; a way to begin the process of assimilating the original tradition into foreign culture. What this then tells us, is that the so called Dead Sea Scrolls are not original. They are copies. Copies of what, is the question. And here is where things begin to get interesting for faithful Christian pilgrims.
   Archaeologists have uncovered not one stone, rock or artifact belonging to the ancient Jews or Hebrews. Not one. Below are a selected list of ancient civilizations for whom the opposite has been found.
   Sumeria 3200–2360 B.C.
   Greece 900–200 B.C
   Phonecia 1100–332 B.C
   Egypt 2850–715 B.C.
   Babylon 1728–1686 B.C.
   Maya 1800 BCE to 250 CE.
   Akkadian 2350–2230 B.C.


   Every single civilization listed above has verified historical records, gravesites, bones, original authorship attributed directly to their existence at specific time and place in history. We cannot find one of the same for the so called Jews. The tale of Abraham, we find, suggests that the patriarch existed after 1800 B.C. Yet there is no trace of him. Or his sons, or his descendants. In fact, the only historical Jewish figure whom gives us some contemplative reprieve is Moses. Who was falsely advertised as being Hebrew when in fact, if he existed at all, he was most likely Ramses.
   There are no ancient ruins, no ancient documents, nothing but the tales of a bunch of decayed writings on animal skin which are falling apart and date back to 150 BC or 250 BC. We don't actually know, because the tests are dealing w/ texts which are in rapid decay. That is not the point however. My point reveals a more startling truth. The point is that the oldest evidence of the Hebrew language is only found from 10 B.C.E. This means that the Hebrew language only existed in circulation for ten years. Ten years before Jesus entered the world stage. And yet, as we know, the Jews of his day did not speak Hebrew, they spoke Aramaic. How is it that an ancient people who pre dated the dawn of civilization do not even have a language to call their own?
   Oh yes, this is true. But the Dead Sea Scrolls, you might say. Yes pilgrim. Even the DSS. It turns out, that the majority of the scrolls were written in Aramaic and Greek. Yes much of the DSS are Hebrew but the idea that the most ancient of writings are Hebrew are simply false. The majority of Hebrew texts found in the DSS are calendars, alphabetic characters, laws and tradition, none of which date back before 10 BC.
   And yet if they were the Hebrews who brought us Abraham. If they were the Hebrews who were led out of captivity by Moses, then how is it that the earliest writings of the Hebrew legacy were not written in Hebrew, but Greek?
  This is why author Norman Golb alleges in his book Who Wrote the Dead Sea Scrolls that they were not the Essenes who were responsible for the texts, but the Jews of Jerusalem who wrote it these books as they prepared for Roman siege. I do not agree with this hypothesis either, as you will find.
   In fact the oldest scrolls, carbon dated back to the time periods of 150 and 250 BCE, perhaps beyond, but they are not Hebrew texts. Now I must ask the pervading question...why, and...how, exactly is it that in these ancient texts, supposedly written before the Roman Empire, even before King David ascended the throne, could Greek texts be found amongst sacred Hebrew historical preservations of literature and artifacts? How were the Greeks even present during this time?
   For we find, faithful pilgrim, that indeed, the oldest of the Dead Sea Scrolls are not in fact Hebrew, they are Greek.
   This then implies that the oldest. The VERY OLDEST of Jewish religious tradition was not penned by Jews or experienced by their Hebrew ancestors, but was created by the conquering Greeks, authored by their heralded king, Alexander. I am not making this up pilgrim. Or would you care to read for yourself:
   "All of the Greek texts among the Dead Sea Scrolls are written in koine, the common dialect of the post-classical Hellenistic and Roman worlds and the New Testament language. A total of 27 Greek manuscripts have been identified from the Qumran caves. This includes all remains of 19 papyri found in Qumran Cave 7, and several Greek manuscripts preserved in Cave 4, made up of mostly biblical fragments. While the majority of the Cave 7 manuscripts cannot be identified, exceptions are a copy of Exodus and an Apocrypha work, the Epistle of Jeremiah. Attempts to identify some Cave 7 Greek fragments as Enoch are subject to debate, while attempts to identify fragments as New Testament have proven unsuccessful."- The Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library 
   Attempts to pass off the Dead Sea Scrolls as proof that the ancient Hebrews wrote their history over three millennia ago, and that through the divine inspiration and intervention by God through human beings, it has somehow retained its original form is just this side of deception. You have been hypnotized, faithful pilgrim, by the corrupted pendulum of your fictitious authors.
   Let us now further examine...for the sake of argument, let us suppose, that the earliest DSS can be carbon dated from 300 BCE. Well now that just happens to be around the same time Alexander invaded Egypt. This is not a coincidence. This is the confluence of cultures that explains why ancient Greek is included amongst the ancient Hebrew and Aramaic texts that comprise the DSS.
   And yet if you still are not convinced, I do not blame you one bit. Your religion resembles a cult more than it does a truth. Because when the truth stares you in the face you will still rather search for ways to explain it away so that you can go back to the church which sponsors your fallacy and enjoy companionship. The like mindedness of others who too know that the man they serve could not be a God. Yet choose to throw away reason and worship him anyway. Your salvation and patterns of influence are not of divine origin but of masonic engineering. What God would piss urine and shit feces like the rest of us?
   I would flog myself if I discovered that the icon Jesus I had worshipped my whole entire life was in the Porto potty filling it up with the stench of his bowls. No man who bleeds like me could be any more than me and this is the truth. This is the illusiveness of some made up religion that fancies the man a god.
   Jesus never existed in the first place. And neither did David, Solomon, the prophets, Joshua, Moses, Abraham, Isaac, or Jacob. You have a bunch of fictitious characters created by the same people who created Homer's Iliad. Don't you know that they are still searching for Troy? They haven't found it and they are not going to find it. Much like everyone is looking up 3,000 years later waiting for Jesus to come back. He's not coming back because he never left in the first place, and he was never here to begin with.
   I can only speculate as to the reasoning behind this creation, yet I can only do so because we've been taught it is the truth. When truly, if you read the book of Enoch, another work of fiction, yet Jewish lore, it reads like historical credulity also. But Enoch is not included. Everyone knows it is fiction. And so is the Torah, or the Old Testament. Neither is the New Testament a work of original truth or the entire bible- for it is all symbolism.
   I rue those who claim that the bible is a lie and that Jesus is a lie. That Islam and Judaism are lies. Of course they are not a lie. They are literary genius, giving those who need a God other than themselves and the harmony of life itself, a purpose in this life. It is their fault they do not understand that sacrificing the quest for truth in this life for the sake of a fictitious God renders you useless in the next life, but it is their choice. Who am I to rob them of it?
   If you tell me that you have found Jesus and that Jesus is the way, I will congratulate you. If this mirage keeps you from starving in this desert wasteland called life, gives your mind strength and emboldens your heart, I am with you pilgrim. We all need strength to endure.
   And yet, I will not bow the knee to a prop used to illustrate the iconography of my ancestor's conquerors.
   If I was a Somali pirate who succeeded in destroying the American Naval power of the Atlantic ocean, and I proceeded to the mainland to conquer the rest of the empire, yet I found there, people who looked like me, who I knew could trace their roots back to my homeland, the motherland of Kemet Afrikaa, I suppose an intellectually superior method of liberation would be to not only give these people a future in the lands I have already conquered, but to give them a history as well. For surely we Africans living in this brothel of Solomon's temple do not know our history. We do not know where we come from.
   Imagine the implications of a man such as Marcus Garvey giving black people, not just a general place of pilgrimage but specific qualifications and landmarks. A purpose, a mission. A kingdom. Now imagine that specific genealogies were created as well, giving black people not just a race to claim, but an identity, a nation, a direct line back to the garden and the original man.
   The ramifications would be devastating for America. The economy would lie in ruins as its largest consumer class marched out in indignation. The halls of power would be in upheaval as the war on drugs and the industrial prison complex no longer had wheels for the mill to turn. Political parties would shift, realign and disappear altogether.
   Christianity itself would stand on the brink of collapse. With no tithes from the ancestors of slaves, the burden of the poor would shift to that of the preachers, turning the inner cities towards anarchy. America would crumble from within.
   The Jews are a false identity of a people unsatisfied with their culture. Written by Greeks, for Greeks. They were embraced by Alexander and given a false history and therefore an engineered path to the future. There never was any mass Exodus, there never was an Israel, and there never was a temple. These tales were created to weaken an empire and enslave a nation. Egypt fell, its treasure was stolen, and the Jews were created. Rome only existed because of these people. The Roman Catholic church, the whole of Christendom owes its existence to these manufactured identities. The word "Jew" itself is not even a real word. It is an English term of Semitic depravity. It only began its introduction into the world's vocabulary after the King James Version was translated. It was inserted into the bible in the same fashion. How can a people exist long before the word itself was even created?
   There are a group of African Americans here in America calling themselves Moors. They are part of an Islamic group known as the Moorish Science Temple of America. These people claim they belong to the Moorish Empire which they claim, spanned the entire globe and was the very first world empire. Nothing could be further from the truth. And yet the Moors in America are a people, who if given the right leader, would pose a serious threat to the status quo.
   The trick of a fabled powerful Jewish nation has been done before. Undoubtedly it will be done again. Black people in America are not Moors because the Moorish empire was never so vast and it no longer exists. The Moors have a country and that country is Morocco not America.
   Much like the black people of today, the Hebrews never had a home. To assert one for them would be a dangerous work of fiction.                        
                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
   The Hebrew language fell completely out of circulation by 200 AD and was not reintroduced until Israel was created by the same lineage which created the people in the first place. Guess who preserved the language? Yes pilgrim, the Roman Catholic Church. How noble of them.
   I suspect, that once Alexander successfully invaded Egypt, he found men and women living in Egypt who looked like him. The Hebrews were an Afro- Asiatic people. Yet the Jews are white.
   It was Alexander who is found in the text: "the Great I am" it is Alexander declaring to great Pharaoh "let my people go." It is Alexander declaring to the nations. "I am the lord your God. You shall have no other Gods before me." It was Alexander declaring "I am a jealous God" there was no voice from heaven. Only a tyrannical egomaniac.
   According to author, historian and professor at Tel Aviv University Shlomo Sand, "the Jewish people were invented, from the Bible to Zionism."
    "The Jews are neither a race nor a nation, but ancient pagans – in the main Berbers from North Africa, Arabs from the south of Arabia, and Turks from the Khazar empire – who converted to Judaism between the fourth and eighth centuries CE."
   Could it be, pilgrim, that the religion of Judaism was created as a truth, dating back to the Greek invasion of Egypt. A way to liberate people Alexander himself could not win over to his cause; but the characters which would bring the religion to life are fictitious? That the Hebrews were a real people but they had no religion and were not a nation. If there ever were Hebrews in Egypt, they were there willingly. And if they lived in Egypt that would make them Africans. The Hebrews, therefore, are not Jews and the Jews are not Hebrews. The Hebrews are Africans, the Jews are Europeans. The Jews never existed until the invention of a Christian church.
   If you do not believe these things pilgrim, I do not blame you. And yet I do not envy you either. Alexander conquered the known world so very quickly because he was the architect of monotheism. He understood that he could unify thrones under one heaven if they each worshipped the God of that heaven. They would bow to him if he positioned himself as that very God.
   Egypt was the vicar of spirituality, which is why it was so necessary that he get there and destroy it. He did so through cunning, manipulation, murder and deception. And the rest of the world still worships him for it.
   It is beyond folly. And yet I still believe. I believe in those who believe in these fictional creations. But I no longer believe in these creations as being legitimate claims to truth. For in fact we have been told not to. Faithful pilgrim if you still find solace in the fact that the ancient Dead Sea Scrolls can be translated almost word for word, directly into the King James Version of the bible, and you take these translations literally then I must point you directly to the very literal translation of the New Testament Galatians Chapter 4:23-24
   "But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise. Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar."   
   And there you have it. The New Testament, explaining its origins in the Old Testament, confirming the truth of both concerning what I have been trying to tell you. These stories are only stories. Nothing more. The bible can be confirmed in one word. Allegory.
   I believe this, because the bible tells me so.

Sunday, February 9, 2014

Jews and Gentiles

   If I asked you to define God, what would you say? How would you define God? And so I ask you: Define God.
   Now that  you have done so, I must ask you. Is this definition your own, or is it the definition that someone has given you?
   There is a clearer way to ask this, and that is, before you started immersing yourself into the doctrine of your religion of choice... before you heard from anyone else who God was, what God was, where God was; who was God to you?
   Chances are that you do not recall a time where you encountered the idea of God independent of the definitions or influence of others. This is not your fault of course or mine. We are creatures of our environment.
   But how do you define something that has no history?
   How do you accept the stories of authors that have no identity and therefore no confirmation, as truth written by God and for God, inspired by him. How do you know that God is a male. How do you know that God is not a woman? What makes you think that God could be either?
   What I've come to understand is that we all define God in our own way. The concept of religion is not superior. It is simply more widely accepted and therefore practiced than a humble individual notion. And yet, it does not make it true.  
   I want to be clear that I believe in God. I believe in Jesus. But I do not believe that Jesus actually existed. Therefore, I do not believe that Jesus was God's son. I believe in Jesus the ideal; the concept; the moral fabric that would weave such a creation. I believe in that Jesus. But Jesus never existed. Sin is a fabrication of something more grave and practical: disloyalty and disharmony.
  The idea that it is a sin to love whomever you choose, or to commit adultery is laughable. Name one old testament wedding. Who married Adam and Eve? Name one old testament patriarch that did not have more than one wife. Marriage is an institution created by people. Established by people who defined their lives by methods of oppression.
   These views of mine place me in an incredible juxtaposition amongst my peers for they are the majority, Christians, who live and die by every word in that leather bound text and are devoted to the accepted lineage of its creed. I do not seek to unravel this devotion because this devotion was brought about by elements more powerful and conclusive than mere words. This devotion was brought about by the systematic engineering of culture. And this is something that words, no matter how concise, supported and evidenced cannot compete against.
   The American way of life demands a Savior. It demands a savior because America is a carbon copy of the Greco- Roman empire. Nothing could be more vile, obscene or amoral than that heathen state of greed, murder, lust and destruction. Yet America was a necessary evolution of the change brought about by the maturation of science. The Greco- Roman empire demanded a moral savior because of its immoral seed, its only begotten son, Capitalism, doomed the world it knew and continues to whore, to slavery and infested brothels. The treasure which funded its expansion was brutally taken from Africa.
   Jesus is as Capitol as the Federal Reserve. Just as empirical as the rulers his image represents. The cross is as sacred as the constitution and that is because they both arose from the same construct.
   Imagine, for a moment, pledging your loyalty to someone you've never met, and will never actually know. And yet you are told that this person has done everything for you and therefore you owe this man your allegiance. The conscious mind would then ask the following:
   "What is it that this Savior, this man, has done for me?" We then find that the entirety of our salvation is based on a construct called sin. This debilitating entity that has no premise was seemingly created out of thin air. The problem, is that it was created from the same people who gave us Jesus in the first place.
   That is like saying that we have to pay taxes to avoid our nation's economy defaulting on its loans, only to find that we are paying taxes to the very same folks who are creating our debt in the first place. Which of course happens to be precisely what is going on in this very moment thanks to the creation of the Federal Reserve System. 
  
 
   I will anger a great many with this article. No doubt I have already angered a great many. The truth of the matter is, however, that none of my research is original. I research everything that I write and each of my articles are the investigation of claims made by true historians. Not evangelical apologists who simply learned a way of thinking from a school of thought created by the people who created the culture in the first place.
   I'm not a theologian who is a professional regurgitation of commentaries. I posses intellectual vigor.
   I do not write or make claims based on a point of view to steer an agenda. For the only agenda I have is the truth. And you will find that if you escape the learned traditions of your religious education and view things purely as an observer of historical facts, the truth illuminates the lies.
   I make no apologies for my views. I am an African. I am a liberationist. And I therefore am an African liberationist. My native land has been conquered by invaders and my people have been in exile ever since. We have adopted pagan culture. We have adopted pagan religion. And we have adopted pagan wives. We have been stripped of our ancestral rights and heritage, to the effect that we no longer know to what tribe we belong. We have been given the name of our conquerors and oppressors. Our spirituality was stolen, recreated in the image of Europeans and fed back to us in the form of a pagan religion called Christianity. I have no choice but to speak out against the lies that have befallen my people. I have no choice but to resurrect the voices of my murdered ancestors. I have no choice but to summon the royalty of the Pharaoh's of old so that anyone who will listen can know what has been done; what is being done, and what will be done.
   Do not mistake my words for hatred. Do not accept the infantile dissemination of logic that conveniences my scorn for bitterness. Bitterness means that you have no hope and no recourse. I assure you this could not be further from the truth.
   It is a fact; an irrefutable fact that the book called the bible is a forgery. Yes I have said it. And no matter how adamantly you may try and prove this assertion false, you will only succeed in turning over the rocks of ancient Egypt that endure. And they are these rocks which tell the truth. They are these rocks which have been there all along; shouted down by a religious ruling class who knew the truth but obscured it from the conscious of the public. But the evidence has been presented, the cases have been made and the verdict is in. It does not matter how many appeals the Christian church files, and how many motions they've tried to suppress, the verdict has been read and it is not in the favor of this religion which has been created in the name of a man they have called Jesus.
   Forgery is defined as the action of forging or producing a copy of a document, signature, banknote, or work of art which alters the integrity of the original. None of the books of the New Testament were written by any of the men they are claimed to have been written by. None of the gospels are. None of the epistles are. They have been tampered with and altered time and time again. Not only through the unfortunate method of language translation but by the simple fact that we do not know who the original authors were in the first place. *See my previous article: The Swastika of Martin Luther.
   None of the books of the Old Testament were the writings of any of the authors they are reported as have being written by and we know this because the first copies of the Torah only date back 800 years which is 800 years after the first New Testament bible was published. I repeat, the oldest known Torah scroll is only dated as far back as the thirteenth century A.D. do not take my word for it pilgrim. Look it up for yourself. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/05/130530-worlds-oldest-torah-scroll-bible-bologna-carbon-dating/
   And I quote: "This week, University of Bologna Professor Mauro Perani announced the results of carbon-14 tests authenticating the scroll's age as roughly 800 years old.
The scroll dates to between 1155 and 1225, making it the oldest complete Torah scroll on record." -Diane Cole
Published May 30, 2013
  
   What I am telling you pilgrim, is that writings which are suppose to be ancient law, existing during the time of David, the law that Jesus came to fulfill never existed until the Catholic church created it.
   We know we do not know who the original authors were because each of the afore mentioned books and scroll(s) were written; not published; written decades and in the case of the Torah- centuries after the persons the books are attributed to- died. The question then, is who wrote the bible?
   The Dead Sea Scrolls are a mockery of historicity. I understand the enthusiasm over the fact that upwards of 500 B.C. there were found fragments of texts which mimic almost identically the books of the Torah and Old Testament Bible. What is just as ludicrous is that these texts are found amongst a slew of other fragments that are texts belonging to Jewish stories which have uniformly been accepted as myth, legend and literary fiction.
  We are known by the company we keep. If I go to a library under the fiction section and I find a fictitious book that reads like an historical document, it is still fiction. And the author who put it there knows it.
   Furthermore, mere fragments of some of the Septuagint have been included in these legendary scrolls. Are we then to assume that the rest of the writings that were omitted are somehow proof that they were ever actually written? And how is this conclusion drawn? Because the texts, which no one knows their origin, say that it is the word of God.
   Foolish pilgrim, who wrote it? If you don't know who wrote something, you cannot verify its authenticity. If you cannot suggest who wrote it you cannot suggest it is reliable. These stories allege events that have never been seen in this world nor ever will be. And the more outlandish they are, the more religious they become. History does not know who the Jews are. And there certainly was no mass Exodus from Egypt. It is not recorded anywhere.
   Observe:
   "We Jews and Church Leaders have known since the beginning of Christianity that it was
synthesized by the Roman Piso family for the purpose of maintaining control over the masses and to
placate slaves. And, this is why we Jews are the "Chosen People" and why we have endured so
much for so many years; we are witnesses to the lie. Our ancestors wrote what they could about
this in our texts."

FROM CHAPTER I (The True Authorship of the New Testament)
  
   The authors of the bible are the Piso/Flavian dynasty. And that is why the only historian in the history of the world who can independently verify the accuracy of the bible is a man called Flavius Josephus.
   "Professor Bruno Bauer, in his work of 1877 "Christ and the Caesars" stated that he had concluded that the Romans had authored the New Testament and that Flavius Josephus was the inventor of Jesus."
   What is the Piso/Flavius dynasty? You may ask. The Piso family are royal relatives of the Roman  Herods who were given control of the Semitic provinces. The Herods of course were relatives to the Flavian Emperors. Flavius Josephus, in fact, was merely a pseudonym for the real face behind the bible and its "independent" history. Josephus' real name was Arrius Piso.
   Observe:
   The tie-in is that Arria the Elder was married to the emperor Vespasian’s
brother (before Vespasian became emperor). He was T. Flavius Sabinus.

From this relationship we find the connection to the alias names of the Pisos
as "Paetus". Quoting from "The True Authorship of the New Testament," by
Abelard Reuchlin; "Vespasian relied upon Piso because he was grandson of
his own brother - Vespasian’s brother, T. Flavius Sabinus, had married Arria
Sr. (i.e., Arria the Elder), who was Piso’s maternal grandmother. Piso’s
identity as thus also a Flavian is decipherable from the appearance in the
Flavian family line of L. Caesennius Paetus (Townend, Gavin, "Some Flavian
Connections," Journal of Roman Studies, LI. 54, 62, 1961). That was an alias
(like Thrasea Paetus) of Piso’s father, L. Calpurnius Piso [ Note: we now
know Arrius Piso’s father to have been Gaius Calpurnius Piso who was
executed by Nero]. See page 20 supra, wherein Piso himself also is mentioned
as a Caesennius Paetus. That is the true reason Piso used the literary
pseudonym of Flavius; it was not because of his alleged - but untrue and
hardly necessary - adoption by Emperor Flavius Vespasian. He was in fact
(already) a Flavian."

  
   The question then, is who was Arrius Piso? The answer is simple. He was Roman royalty. The governor of Syria and what is now also called Palestine. What you will find is that the so called Jews found their origins here not in the wilderness of a so called Canaan. Instead, there in the Semitic region of Syria, they are in fact European royalty. The Hebrews are not Jewish. The Jews are not Hebrews. The Hebrews are Africans. The Jews are European royalty.
   It is a fact that Mark was the first gospel to be written. It is believed; based on this fact, that the other the other three gospels of Matthew, Luke and John were written based on the claims of Mark. Of course this claim was made before the first recorded bible ever written Codex Sinaiticus revealed that there was no resurrection story in Mark. Which means that Mark 16:9-20 were the creation of someone. Who created it, why they created it, and when they created it is unknown. But the fact of the matter is that the resurrection of the man called Jesus was not contemporary to the life of the man. It was created over 400 years after Jesus died. And so to were the other three gospels.
  It doesn't mater if you don't believe me; you can research it for yourself.  Therefore do not take my word for it, the gospels are not contemporary to the events they claim to be witnessing and neither are the epistles. None of the authors were eyewitnesses to Jesus; of Jesus; to Jesus. In any court of law, this is what we would consider hearsay. They are anonymous sources- people we cannot know their identity. The only claims that these people ever existed are made by the oral traditions inscribed in the forged writings of the bible.
   The stories of Jesus reflected in the gospels and the epistles are stories that are modifications of the oral traditions of Jesus and adaptions of Egyptian mythology.
   I do not contend that Jesus existed. I do not contend that Jesus was God's son. We are all God's children. What I do contend however, is that the biblical accounts of the man called Jesus; which by the way wasn't even his real name, neither was it Ye'shua or Ye'hoshua because that means Joshua. In fact the name Jesus never existed until the fourth century A.D.
   Constantine was the ruling spirit at Nicaea and he ultimately decided upon a new god for them. To involve British factions, he ruled that the name of the great Druid god, Hesus, be joined with the Eastern Savior-god, Krishna (Krishna is Sanskrit for Christ), and thus Hesus Krishna would be the official name of the new Roman god. -The Swastika of Martin Luther.
   Again you can look this up.
   What I do not believe is that the Jews ever existed. I believe an Afro- Semitic people called Hebrews existed. But the Hebrews and the Jews are not the same thing. I do not believe that there was ever an Exodus from Egypt and therefore I do no believe any of the stories attributed to these people. I do not believe there was a king David. I do not believe in a so called royal bloodline. And even if I did, you would still have to explain to me why there are two different lineages that the book of Matthews gives Jesus' royal origin. Furthermore, if he was born of a virgin; which I do not believe either, the lineages listed are not of Mary's, they are both Joseph's.
   Call me stupid but if I cannot produce the bloodline of my mother, only that of my father- from whom I was never actually conceived because I claim my conception was of immaculate divine origin- there is reason to believe that I never existed either.
   There is no historical evidence that there was ever any exodus from Egypt. (See Unearthing the Bible).
   There is no evidence of Solomon, David, Joshua, or Moses, or any other of these so called Jewish Patriarchs. What you have instead are an Afro- Semitic people who spoke Aramaic, which is not to be confused with Arabic, a nomadic people with no home and no ancestral heritage who were given a history by the most powerful institution ever created: the Roman Catholic church.
   Supposedly these people called the Jews established a kingdom which dwarfed the concepts of the greatest empirical nations of their time; Babylonians, the Persians, and the Egyptians. And yet not one iota of concrete evidence of the existence of these people can be found. Not one burial ground, monument, artifact, or token can be found to attribute the existence of a people called the Jews. Again, not to be confused with Hebrews, which are Aramaic nomads; history cannot figure out where the Jews belong in the chronological summary of events. The people who call themselves Jews today are not Hebrews, they are European Semites.
   The only place that the Jews existed is the bible. History cannot find them.
   I am going to make a claim that may sound absurd to you. But it only sounds absurd because you've never heard it before. Yet if you do your research you will discover that the absurdity is historical fact, verified, not only by a plagiarized book, but by separate cultures spawning vast oceanic waters and histories which have verifiable records. Before I present my thesis I want to first present some factual parallels which establish the premise for this thesis.
   Some parallels between Horus and Jesus Christ:

1. Horus born of a virgin. Jesus born of a virgin.

2. The foster father of Horus was Seb or Seph. Jesus was fostered by Joseph.

3. Horus was of royal descent. Jesus was of royal descent.

4. Horus birth accompanied by three solar deities [star gazers] who followed by the morning star of Sirius bearing gifts. Jesus birth accompanied by three wise men [Zoroastrian star gazers] who followed by a star “in the east” bearing gifts.

5. The birth of Horus announced by angels. The birth of Jesus announced by angels.

6. Herut tried to murder the infant Horus. Herod slaughtered every first born in an attempt to kill Jesus the forthcoming messiah.

7. Horus is baptized at age 30 by Anup the Baptiser at a river. Jesus is baptized at age 30 by John the Baptist at a river.

8. Horus resists temptation by the evil Sut [Sut was to be the precursor for the Hebrew Satan] on a high mountain. Jesus resists temptation by Satan on a high mountain.

9. Horus had 12 followers. Jesus had 12 disciples.

10. Horus performed miracles like healing the sick and walking on water. Jesus performed miracles like healing the sick and walking on water.

11. Horus raised someone from the grave [his father Osiris] Jesus raised Lazarus [notice the name similarity] from the grave. Lazarus is short for Elasarus - the “us” on the end is romanized. Elasarus was derived from “El-Asar” which was the name given to Osiris.

12. Horus was buried and resurrected in the city of Anu. The place Bethany mentioned in John was a derivative of the words “Bet” and “Anu” which translates “the house of Anu”. The ‘y’ on the end of bethany is interchangeable with the letter ‘u’.

13. Horus was killed by crucifixtion. Jesus was crucified.

14. Horus was accompanied by two thieves at the crucifixtion. Jesus was crucified with two thieves.

15. Horus was buried in a tomb at Anu. Jesus was buried in a tomb located in Bethany [Bet-Anu].

16. Horus was resurrected after 3 days. Jesus was “said” to resurrected after over a period of three days.

17. The resurrection of Horus was announced by three women. The resurrection of Jesus was announced by three women.

18. Horus was given the titel KRST which means “anointed one” Jesus was given the title Christ [Christos] meaning “anointed one”
  
   Understand that Egyptian mythology, or Maat, predates the legacy of the man called Jesus Christ by more than 3000 years. I will present compelling arguments that the entire bible is the plagiarized literature of Maat. But before we get there I want you to understand why the Jews were created by the Roman Catholics, why and how their legacy has been widely and successfully distributed as truth. To do this I will use the bible. The following is an excerpt taken from Genesis 10:2-20.
   2 The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras. 3 And the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz, and Riphath, and Togarmah. 4 And the sons of Javan; Elishah, and Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim. 5 By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations. 6 And the sons of Ham; Cush, and Mizraim, and Phut, and Canaan. 7 And the sons of Cush; Seba, and Havilah, and Sabtah, and Raamah, and Sabtecha: and the sons of Raamah; Sheba, and Dedan. 8 And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a mighty one in the earth. 9 He was a mighty hunter before the LORD: wherefore it is said , Even as Nimrod the mighty hunter before the LORD. 10 And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, and Erech, and Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar. 11 Out of that land went forth Asshur, and builded Nineveh, and the city Rehoboth, and Calah, 12 And Resen between Nineveh and Calah: the same is a great city. 13 And Mizraim begat Ludim, and Anamim, and Lehabim, and Naphtuhim, 14 And Pathrusim, and Casluhim, (out of whom came Philistim,) and Caphtorim. 15 And Canaan begat Sidon his firstborn, and Heth, 16 And the Jebusite, and the Amorite, and the Girgasite, 17 And the Hivite, and the Arkite, and the Sinite, 18 And the Arvadite, and the Zemarite, and the Hamathite: and afterward were the families of the Canaanites spread abroad . 19 And the border of the Canaanites was from Sidon, as thou comest to Gerar, unto Gaza; as thou goest , unto Sodom, and Gomorrah, and Admah, and Zeboim, even unto Lasha. 20 These are the sons of Ham, after their families, after their tongues, in their countries, and in their nations.   
   Now, you may ask, why is this important and what does this have to do with anything? It is important my friend because this is the only passage in the Torah that decisively tells you who the Hebrews are and who the Europeans are. You see, the word Gentile never meant anyone who is not a Jew. It meant anyone who is not a descendant of Ham. Verse 5 of the above texts is clearly informing you that the peoples mentioned are the Gentiles. It just so happens that they are all Europeans. 
   The legacy verses of Genesis Chapter 10 are verses 6-20. They are the descendants of Ham. The interesting fact is that they are all African or of African lineage. Cush is Ethiopia, Mizraim is Egypt, Phut is Libya, Canaan is Palestine. I could go on. The point, however, is that according to their own plagiarized source, the Hebrews, who were God's chosen people, were actually Africans. And they are only every European who are the Gentiles. It says so plainly in the text.
   And yet, if you fast forward a few hundred years to the so called new testament gospels and epistles you will find the polar opposite. A redefinition of Gentiles around the construct of Jews which first entered the scene in the new testament. Previously, the Jews did not exist.
   The question then, is who are the Jews? I think the answer is plain. The Jews are Europeans of Semitic lineage who have laid claim to the historical background of the Hebrews. The Hebrews of course, are of African origin. It is this subversion of the true nature of things that have led to the creation of European empires, which did not previously exist, leading to the destruction and ruin of a people, a continent and cultures that begat life in the first place. In order to elevate a culture that you fashioned in your own image, you must first destroy the culture you stole it from. Mark Zuckerburg stole Facebook from the Winklevoss twins and subsequently trampled them into obscurity. PlayStation was created from Nintendo which has been flushed into oblivion. I won't even mention what happened to Sega.
   The UFC has destroyed or consumed every major fight promotion that has gotten in its way. If you look at the UFC today it is not actually the UFC. The UFC is PRIDE, WFA, WEC, Strikeforce. And yet it is the UFC. In the same way, anti- African transatlantic slavery was the result of years of empirical destruction of the peoples whose culture the Greco Roman empire was founded upon. The only way to elevate Rome was to destroy the Africa which spawned it into existence.
   Religion is the deification of a culture. Nothing more. And the agenda of spreading a religion is a method of spreading that culture for culture and racial superiority. The creators of the religion become the God(s) of the people they've conquered; and if implemented properly, it is for this reason that a "liberated" people can be a colony of the conquering force. India is still a colony of great Britain which was preluded by the British Empire which was funded by the Roman Catholic church. India may have won it's independence but it's culture is fashioned after the Empire which fell but exists in the embodiment of the United States.
   Africans live in America. We are not African Americans, we are Africans who have been stripped of our lineage. Our native land was conquered and we were sold into slavery. Unlike the Exodus of the Jews, this is not a fabricated story. We will go home, our monuments will endure, our coins will be remembered and our kings will be celebrated because African liberation will not adopt the ways of our conquerors. We will not accept the culture of our oppressors. Many have. We- I- will not. For when you have knowledge, you don't need faith. Therefore you don't need credit, which means the manufactured creation of debt and sin and grace do not exist. Which is why the search for such a thing and it's discovery is discouraged by the church.
   Anyone who does their research and arrives at any conclusion such as mine is ridiculed as having the spirit of the anti Christ, false prophets, lost, on my way to hell...so on and so forth. Question: if eternity is not a physical place, how can I be punished by the material lakes of fire or be rewarded with the earthly corruptions of streets of gold.
   The Roman Empire never fell. Roman Catholicism insured its survival and the United States of America is its modern Avatar. Yet I want to assert to you that the Jews do not exist. They never existed. The sons of Japheth, called the Gentiles in Genesis 10:2-5 are the only so called Jews who ever existed. You call them Jews; but the bible calls them Gentiles. You decide, faithful Christian, which discernment is correct. The Jews are not a nation.
   Israel was created out of thin air just like sin, just like currency, just like debt. These are the arbitrary orchestrations of powerful people with the agenda of world domination. They've created a masterful story of Armageddon and centered it around the assault against Israel, a nation that, in truth, has no right to exist. But if you put an Islamic republic right in the middle of America's Heartland how would you respond oh Christian? Would you not resort to any means necessary to rid your homeland of the foreign invaders? Then why do you support the state of Israel? God choose the Jews, only if you understand that the Jews created the God that chose them. And the that the Greco- Roman empire created the Jews.
   Have the integrity then to see through the manipulation of the State and the powers of capital control. We will find that the Jews are nothing more than Europeans with Semitic roots. The only chosen people of God, if you believe such a thing, were Africans. Our conquerors knew this and so they created a people called the Jews. They could not allow us to wrestle our heritage back from them. Therefore they organized a religion to go along with the slave ships. They gave us a bible along with our chains. They called themselves Jews to us and we gave up our God given heritage to them so that now our African men are emaciated and our African women are prostitutes, loving, needing and defending the very nation which raped us in the first place. And the tool which begets this depravity is Christianity.
   I will utter this quote: "The central figure of the ancient Egyptian Religion was Osiris, and the chief fundamentals of his cult were the belief in his divinity, death, resurrection, and absolute control of the destinies of the bodies and souls of men. The central point of each Osirian's Religion was his hope of resurrection in a transformed body and of immortality, which could only be realized by him through the death and resurrection of Osiris" (Osiris and the Egyptian Resurrection Volume 1)
   This sounds like a vaguely familiar doctrine to me. And let me ask you, which story came first. I think we know the answer to this. It wasn't the Christian doctrine. Horus, the son of Osiris had a divine nature and a human nature. Horus was believed to be both fully divine and fully human. It is believed that Horus was the twin brother of Sat, otherwise known as Seth. Who was the Egyptian precursor to the European Satan.
    Horus was the son of Osiris and Isis, the product of a virgin birth who rose from the dead through the conquering of his archenemy Set, an original acronym for Satan. At the hand of his only begotten son Horus.
   It is important to understand that this Egyptian story predates the virgin birth of the man called Jesus by centuries. It is also important to understand that the very same people who invaded Egypt are responsible for creating the bible, forging it's literature and establishing the religion of what is today called Christianity. It is just as important to understand that this religion only took shape after the hieroglyphs, which are the ancient Egyptian religious mythology, were translated.
   There is no such thing or person as a man who lived in the ancient Roman Empire named Jesus. I am not trying to be controversial but it is a fact. Jesus is not a Hebrew, Jewish or Semitic name. Jesus, translated into Aramaic, which was the Semitic language of that time, is translated as Ye'hoshua or adapted as Yeshua. But even Yeshua does not mean Jesus. Yeshua means Joshua. There was no Aramaic, Semitic, Jewish, or Hebrew name that one can attribute to Jesus. Jesus Christ didn't exist until the first Council of Nicea. *See The Swastika of Martin Luther
   I am going to get straight to the point and inform you once again, that this is because the savior of the world known as Jesus was a creation of an elite European culture (root word cult) who labeled themselves as Jews. These people created the bible as a plagiarized version of Egyptian Maat.
   What is Maat? Maat or ma'at, also spelled māt or mayet, was the ancient Egyptian concept of truth, balance, order, law, morality, and justice.
   After the European invasion of Egypt by Alexander, Egypt has lost its sovereignty. Egypt lost its sovereignty by the deception of the European alleging that they had come in peace. Egypt has lost its sovereignty and has never regained it. Alexander tried to become recognized as Pharaoh and failed. His successor, Ptolemy I also known as Soter or Savior tried as well but failed. The problem was that they could not decipher the Mecunenta which are called by archeologists as Hieroglyphics.
   Thousands of African men and women died because they refused to decipher their ancient spiritual texts which dated back over two thousand years B.C. The European invaders understood that the key to the might of these savages came as a direct result from the beliefs and the knowledge of the Mecunenta. Religion organizes culture. An organized people are a powerful people, a wealthy people.
   Ptolomy the I was the beginning of the Roman Ptolomy era in Egypt. With the help of Egyptian coptics, the original traitors to the empire, they translated much of our Mecunenta to the invaders. The problem for the invaders is that they did not translate everything properly. Some of this was done on purpose and much of it was a simple matter of the pitfalls of language barriers. Yet what was produced was the plagiarizing of Egyptian spirituality. It was rewritten, Europeanized and fed to the world as their own so that the creators of the religion would be worshipped as God.
   Though a people may overthrow an invader, they not so easily are able to unbelieve  that which you have been taught to believe. That is because religion is psychological warfare. It is nothing more than this.
   Alexander knew that in order to effectively rule Egypt he had to also be accepted into their religious order, in keeping with the tradition of the Pharaohs. Alexander died in 323 B.C. without being granted this enviable right.
   Yet Soter, his Egyptian successor, or Ptolomy I murdered as many Egyptian priests as it took until the Melkite Coptic priests relinquished, sold out, and translated the Mecunenta. They granted him his wish and so changed Soter's, name to Serapis. And yet the only place in Egypt that Serapis' authority was accepted was in Memphis, the region of the Melkite Coptics. In his anger, Serapis shut down all the temples in Egypt.
   In return for their betrayal, the leader of the Melkite Coptic priests, Sylvester, was elected the first pope of the Roman Catholic church. This is why, to this day, Coptic Christians, elect their own Pope and have their own Papal order.
   It is the figure head of Serapis that was adopted as the face of Jesus and is still today the European figure head of the man called Jesus. Christians worship the European conqueror of Egypt. He was a liar, a thief and a murderer.
   I'm not sure where this information was omitted from history. I suppose it was suppressed by the same folks who created this diabolical construct. Currency is nothing more than the physical analogy of salvation. Sin is the spawn of the physical reality of debt. Faith and credit are as closely related. Catholicism needed the Jews in order to expand its influence. For there can be no unification toward empirical expansion without the fear of an opposition.
   In this way Christianity today needs Islam. For without Islam the spread of capitalism and the ever growing net of wealth disparity and global servitude cannot be realized.
   The key is this: If you can convince the people you've stripped of wealth that their salvation depends on surrendering their earthly riches in return for eternal wealth that can only come from serving the one who stripped you in the first place, then you will inherit eternal salvation and riches that will never die.
   Insanity does not begin to describe this motive or belief. It is lunacy. And yet this lunacy has been encouraged and demanded by our culture. If you live in a capitalist culture you need a Savior. If you live in a dictatorship you do not need a moral Savior, you need a physical conqueror.
   We find that each monotheistic religion is not original. It is not original because they each borrowed from each other. The question then, is where did they borrow from?
   The answer of course is Africa. The story of Africa is greater than the continent itself. The story of Africa is the story of creation. God is not up in heaven. God is within you. God is of you. God is you. God is us. All of us together, all of our spirits united is God. And yet with the confusion of religion, currency and monies that do not exist, this unity can never be found. And God will forever be a euphemism, not a reality.
   I want every woman and man to know and understand that he is here because he created himself. She is here because she created herself. Life is the paintings we have imagined as ever present realities coming to completion. The purpose of life is to experience what we have created, individually and collectively in order to establish harmony for the next painting. And the next, and the next. No artist ever depletes himself of creations.  Artists fail to create when they lose inspiration. Therefore your spirit only dies when you cease to encourage its production. Religions teach you to stop searching. To believe that you have found it.
   But truth is ever evolving, and so is God because we are the architects by the lives we live and the patterns we weave.
   Aligning yourself with religious regimes may give you purpose in this life, but it will rob you of your place in the next.
   Spirits do not die. They are eternal because spirits are possibilities. Canvasses that are waiting for inspiration.
   Spirits have no memories only consciousness. Here on this earth we have been compounded with a soul. This soul is our memory, our primary weapon against insignificance. It is why life is so sacred. For whatever period of time harmony suggests, we have the ability to remember everything, both past and future, in order to become the gods we created ourselves to be. Therefore, never stop searching. Jesus is not the answer. Jesus is a proposition. Muhammad is not the solution. Merely an antithesis against selected influence.
   We were given our souls to recall why we are here. We created ourselves and therefore we must give ourselves life. We must give each other life. And life will give us a future. You owe your existence to harmony; the balance of spirits and souls.
   I do not worship God because God is not meant to be worshipped. God is meant to be created with every breath, every stroke, every idea, every relation. God is evolving whether you know it or not, whether you believe it or not. If you think that God is some deified moral authority arbitrating his rules and laws down to a wayward woeful man, you belong on the slave ship your ancestors died on or the chains your forefathers created.
   Our morals are each different yet they are measured on the same scale, called to the same standard. Our life spans are not the same and yet we determine this with the life we lived before, with the patterns we use to paint the creation.
   Do not blame God for the evils of the world, do not blame Satan. Satan and God are one and the same. It is you and I; I and I who are responsible for the now, the past and the future.
   "I know... the blasphemy by those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan."-Revelation 2:9